You know, I didn't accurately read your original post.That's what I was afraid of. So now, switching will cost me $250 instead of $45. And that's just because I already have some cleaner & oil from before.
I guess I could always just put the filter in & see what happens, eh? I'll be able to hear any decel popping right away, maybe check the spark plugs after a couple hundred miles.You know, I didn't accurately read your original post.
I thought you meant you was putting a new intake on, not just replacing the filter.
Simply replacing the filter probably won't change the air intake amount enough to force getting a fuel processor.
Rule of thumb is that if you do one or the other (exhaust or intake), no fuel mgt. is necessary. Only if you do both.Has anyone installed and air intake without adding any kind of after market exhaust? If so did it require any sort of fuel management changes? I only ask because the stock exhaust on my bike is adequate and I have read more posts about restriction on the intake verses the exhaust.
Unfortunately, these motorcycle computers are not nearly as advanced as the GM computers you are used to. They are lean to begin with, and will be way lean with pipes and intake. Folks have documented the performance drop on dyno's. In addition, the bike runs so lean that it may run hot, idle rough, or hesitate. The GM computers will have some manner of adjusting themselves, whereas these computers will adjust very little.Not real sure but I do computer programming on automobiles and can say that the ECUs have a little wiggle room coded into them, meaning on my FZ6R I built a free flow exhaust, modified the air box and added a K&N filter, with no added controller has 22 thousand on it that way and no ill effects, has plenty of power (actually more), runs fine.
I think if you knew what I know about ECUs you would know that the ECUs are automatically adjustable to a certain extent. And when some ones says lean just what is lean to them? 14.71? 15.1? 16.1?
All the controllers (Power Commander etc...) do is injector pulse width, more fuel, less fuel, when someones says the bike is lean they don't consider that lean actually makes more power, it is a old myth that more fuel makes more power, to much fuel can make something have less power. And most don't know that even gas can be 5% to 10% Ethanol so every time you fill up you may be changing the AFR (leaner, richer).
So a controller gives you 4hp, yep about 4hp ($300 for 4hp). In the old carburetor days it was a fact rejetting was a must, in the ECU age no so much. My $.02
I have been programming GM computers for 8 years now.
For sure. And I like your style! Look for numbers, not opinions! There are some dyno results on this forum if you search around. When I'm not posting from my phone I'll search around a bit, too, and see if I can't dig some old threads up. Many have had their bikes dyno'ed. And I think RACNRAY(?) may have done some Dyno experiments with his 1700 in regards to a stock computer with intake and exhaust mods.That's kind of what I was getting at. Does anyone have objective information as to which modifications yield what power and A/F ratio changes? I already have a pretty good butt dyno and I can smell when something is running way rich. That being said, documented result taken by calibrated instruments would be most helpful here. I know there will be variances between to like models, but an approximate beyond speculation would be helpful for anyone trying to prioritize future modifications. I realize given the ability of most motorcycle ECUs, especially the one on the VN2000 that it's beyond unlikely to achieve a stoichiometrically perfect A/F ratio but the closer one can get, the more power and economy will be benefited.
It's true that they've been discontinuted, but they are also dirt cheap right now (used). So there may be an influx of 'new owners' even if there aren't 'new bikes'. For whatever reason (My theory is, people who have that price range in mind for a new metric bike want bags and a fairing), the bike wouldn't sell at it's price point. But it is selling well in the used market for peanuts. So who knows, there may be hope yet for the aftermarket!Yeah, you know the old saying about opinions. I'm just thinking that there has to be someone out there that has done the processor, intake, and exhaust in some order or combination and recorded the power, processor settings and A/F ratio that worked best for each combination tried. I know if I get in a position where I'm ready to perform all three of these, I will be thoroughly documenting everything, not only for my benefit, but for the benefit of others as well. I realize that since the 2000's have been discontinued it's unlikely to see a big boom in people performing new mods as the support from the aftermarket is unlikely to grow from what is at newest a three year old bike.
I wish that was the case, but take pipes for example. Just in the last 1.5 years I have had mine. You could get 3 different cobra pipes, V&H, Samson, HardKrome, Freedom Performance pipes, Shogun and I am sure there were others. I don't know if all places quit carrying them but Dennis Kirk only carries the Cobra Pipes, V&H, and Shogun (which are on Closeout Now). But I say companies like Cobra and V&H will hang in there for a while but your selection will be small.It's true that they've been discontinuted, but they are also dirt cheap right now (used). So there may be an influx of 'new owners' even if there aren't 'new bikes'. For whatever reason (My theory is, people who have that price range in mind for a new metric bike want bags and a fairing), the bike wouldn't sell at it's price point. But it is selling well in the used market for peanuts. So who knows, there may be hope yet for the aftermarket!
That's the fun thing about numbers. Increasing 10 by 50% give you 15 (5 more) but increasing 20 by 50% will give you 30 (10 more). I would say that you get a bigger percentage gain on your lower HP bike to make the percent higher. I feel using percents is just a good way of marketing.30 to 50% with just intake, exhaust, and PC (et al)? I have to think that's a pretty rare situation on a stock bike.
I will address in comment above with retort.Unfortunately, these motorcycle computers are not nearly as advanced as the GM computers you are used to. They are lean to begin with, and will be way lean with pipes and intake. Folks have documented the performance drop on dyno's. In addition, the bike runs so lean that it may run hot, idle rough, or hesitate. The GM computers will have some manner of adjusting themselves, whereas these computers will adjust very little. AIR FUEL SPARK 3 basic components for a engine to run, all have that in common, an air pump. GM's ECUs may have more due to the fact they have a STFT and LTFT but even the most rudimentary controller will have some kind of adjustment you can't just hope all engines run exactly the same, which they don't and not to mention fuel form pump to pump there has to be a sliding scale to adjust for such.
Not sure where you got the 4 horsepower number, but on these motorcycles that number is SIGNIFICANTLY different. It's been proven time and time again, folks have thrown their bikes on a dyno and seen very big improvements (30~50% sometimes!) once they got a fuel processor on to go with their pipes and intakes. In dealing with controllers, Diesels will yield the most with a tune, gas at best in a 400hp engine will yield 10 to 20hp increase. In a bike it is like 4hp with a controller and maybe 10-12 with filter, pipes and controller if that. Now if you put a different cam grind in and tune for that, different story or boost.
On cars built right now, they have super high compression (12:1+), variable valve timing, and other technologies in order to help them make more power when lean. Then they are programmed to run lean to improve fuel economy and satisfy the EPA. On our bikes, we didn't get so lucky. They just made it lean, with no real innovations to make the engines perform better lean. People are able to get dyno-proven gains with JUST a fuel processor on a stock bike because of the way these are programmed from the factory (plus the bike itself running cooler, etc.)
14.71 is stoichiometric, best possible power you can have, so when you say lean, again just what is lean? I run at cruise 16.1 and never run hot or knock some even run 17.1 or more in Australia where lean cruise is legal (higher number in AFR is leaner). Dumping fuel to make a NA (naturally aspirated) cooler is bad practice, boosted yes, you need richer to keep from knocking.