Vulcan 1700 Weight - Kawasaki Vulcan Forum : Vulcan Forums
 4Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-24-2016, 11:13 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 21
Vulcan 1700 Weight

I've owned a Harley Davidson Road Glide for a few years now. Last week I bought a used Vulcan 900 Classic LT and the first thing I noticed about it is it feels very light compared to my Road Glide, and even a Softail Custom. My question is how does a bike like the Vulcan 1700 Nomad feel compared to a Vulcan 900 Classic LT? The Vulcan 900 Classic LT looks like a full size cruiser, but I was amazed how light it feels. Does Kawasaki also keep the weight low on the Vulcan 1700 Nomad?
BadJack is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-25-2016, 01:21 AM
Lifetime Premium
 
Diggles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Cairns, Queensland
Year/Make/Model: 2012 Nomad
Displacement/CC's: 1700
Color: Red & Silver
Gender: Male
Posts: 274
Garage
I notice this when riding my 800 Classic - it feels like a scooter compared to the Nomad 1700. Dry weight for the 800 is 230kg (about 500 lbs) whilst the Nomad is 370kgs (815 lbs). If I ever drop one I hope it is the 800.

2005 Classic 800 (sold)

2012 Nomad 1700
Ivanized(2)
RACNRAY throttle mod,Avon Air grips
Vance & Hines slip ons
HD highway pegs
Grasshopper backrest
S/Steel pannier kick guards
Custom lowers
LED running lights
Diggles is offline  
post #3 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-25-2016, 07:44 AM
Senior Member
 
CarGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Marcos, TX
Year/Make/Model: 2014 Nomad ABS
Displacement/CC's: 1700
Color: Black/White
Gender: Male
Posts: 306
Garage
The Nomad is very heavy when pushing, getting off kickstand, etc. Basically, doing anything when sitting still. However, once moving it feels very lightweight. It's not quite as nimble as my 900 was, but is still surprisingly agile given it's weight. The biggest difference from the 900 is comfort. When cruising at higher speeds I can really relax instead of fighting wind gusts and vibrations. If only the Nomad could get the same fuel mileage. There are many times I miss the 900, but not when I'm on the highway!
Demoliton Man likes this.

Go for the ride!
2014 Kawasaki 1700 Nomad ABS
2008 Kawasaki 900 Classic LT (sold 2015 42k miles)
1975 Kawasaki KZ400 (sold ~1985)
1970 Suzuki TS250 Scrambler (stolen 1971)
1968 Bridgestone 200 MKII RS (sold 1970)
Patriot Guard Rider
USN 1971-75
CarGuy is online now  
 
post #4 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-25-2016, 10:14 AM
Senior Member
 
JD Hog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Placerville California
Year/Make/Model: 2015 Vulcan Voyager
Displacement/CC's: 1700
Color: Metallic Carbon Gray/Metallic Spark Black
Gender: Male
Posts: 277
Garage
I have owned an '01 & '08 HD Ultra Classic and now a '15 Vulcan Voyager and they are all heavy when not moving. I did find that the Voyager was much easier to handle at very low speeds compared to the Ultra Classic. It also handles much better in high winds on the highway and when approaching semi trucks on small two lane highways.

Jim Diebolt
2015 Vulcan 1700 Voyager ABS
"The Black Kaw"


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JD Hog is offline  
post #5 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-25-2016, 02:50 PM
Top Contributor
 
revrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: syracuse ny
Year/Make/Model: 2010 NOMAD
Displacement/CC's: 1700
Color: Black/titanium
Posts: 1,487
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarGuy View Post
The Nomad is very heavy when pushing, getting off kickstand, etc. Basically, doing anything when sitting still. However, once moving it feels very lightweight. It's not quite as nimble as my 900 was, but is still surprisingly agile given it's weight. The biggest difference from the 900 is comfort. When cruising at higher speeds I can really relax instead of fighting wind gusts and vibrations. If only the Nomad could get the same fuel mileage. There are many times I miss the 900, but not when I'm on the highway!
Bingo,could not have said it any better
Demoliton Man likes this.
revrider is offline  
post #6 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-25-2016, 04:43 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 21
Thanks for all the info. I now think all big twins feel heavy, and the 900 Classic LT is my favorite cruiser motorcycle. Its 650 lbs, buts feels lighter than my 400 lb KLR 650, and gets the same or better mpg. Even with a full tank of gas it feels lighter than the KLR. Its great for running around town, and the windshield does as good a job keeping wind off your chest and helmet as any full size touring motorcycle I have ridden. I also think the 900 does ok on the highway at speeds around 60 mph. I could tell the 900 is more vulnerable to wind gusts than the HD Road Glide, but I didn't think it was a big deal. The 900 is also a big roomy motorcycle and comfortable for big riders. I hear people say the 900 is a beginners motorcycle, but I don't think its true. 903cc is a descent engine size and I would be more willing to label the Vulcan S a beginners bike, and definitely the Yamaha 250 V-star and Honda 250 Rebel.
BadJack is offline  
post #7 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-25-2016, 04:52 PM
Senior Member
 
CarGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Marcos, TX
Year/Make/Model: 2014 Nomad ABS
Displacement/CC's: 1700
Color: Black/White
Gender: Male
Posts: 306
Garage
IMO, the 900 is not just a beginner's bike. When I had mine I traveled many miles to and through many states. It never faltered. You can run it all day at 75mph without worries. The only reason I sold it and got the Nomad was for the comfort. I enjoy touring and racking up miles and the 900's vibration and suspension (more likely due to the lighter weight of the bike) just got to me on the last 3800 mile trip I went on. Around town the 900 is unbeatable and is one of the times I miss mine, but don't be afraid to take it on long trips, either.

Go for the ride!
2014 Kawasaki 1700 Nomad ABS
2008 Kawasaki 900 Classic LT (sold 2015 42k miles)
1975 Kawasaki KZ400 (sold ~1985)
1970 Suzuki TS250 Scrambler (stolen 1971)
1968 Bridgestone 200 MKII RS (sold 1970)
Patriot Guard Rider
USN 1971-75
CarGuy is online now  
post #8 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-28-2016, 05:00 PM
Top Contributor
 
twowheeladdict's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,656
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Hog View Post
I have owned an '01 & '08 HD Ultra Classic and now a '15 Vulcan Voyager and they are all heavy when not moving. I did find that the Voyager was much easier to handle at very low speeds compared to the Ultra Classic. It also handles much better in high winds on the highway and when approaching semi trucks on small two lane highways.
That is because your Harleys had the batwings. Can't compare them to the Road Glide or Voyager. The new road glide fairing is much more aerodynamic than the Voyager fairing, and both are frame mounted.
twowheeladdict is offline  
post #9 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-28-2016, 05:03 PM
Top Contributor
 
twowheeladdict's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,656
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadJack View Post
Thanks for all the info. I now think all big twins feel heavy, and the 900 Classic LT is my favorite cruiser motorcycle. Its 650 lbs, buts feels lighter than my 400 lb KLR 650, and gets the same or better mpg. Even with a full tank of gas it feels lighter than the KLR. Its great for running around town, and the windshield does as good a job keeping wind off your chest and helmet as any full size touring motorcycle I have ridden. I also think the 900 does ok on the highway at speeds around 60 mph. I could tell the 900 is more vulnerable to wind gusts than the HD Road Glide, but I didn't think it was a big deal. The 900 is also a big roomy motorcycle and comfortable for big riders. I hear people say the 900 is a beginners motorcycle, but I don't think its true. 903cc is a descent engine size and I would be more willing to label the Vulcan S a beginners bike, and definitely the Yamaha 250 V-star and Honda 250 Rebel.
The Vulcan S is a ninja derived engine. It will surprise larger cruiser riders. Especially when the Road gets twisty.
My only two negatives with the 900 lineup is 5 speed, and having to do valve adjustments.
twowheeladdict is offline  
post #10 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-28-2016, 08:39 PM
Lifetime Premium
 
VulcanDan61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Northern Virginia
Year/Make/Model: 2011 Nomad
Displacement/CC's: 1700
Gender: Male
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by twowheeladdict View Post
The Vulcan S is a ninja derived engine. It will surprise larger cruiser riders. Especially when the Road gets twisty.
My only two negatives with the 900 lineup is 5 speed, and having to do valve adjustments.
Loved my 900 and frequently miss it. Agree on the negatives. On secondary roads, the 9 was hard to beat. But I wanted a little bit lower RPMs at highway speed. That's what drove me to the the Nomad, which I find incredibly comfortable and more nimble than expected. twowheel is making me wonder if my next bike might have a frame mounted fairing... Used to hate the look. But function trumps form in many cases, and the look gets better as you get used to it.
CarGuy likes this.

2011 Nomad: Black & Metallic Gray, Chuckster's Light Bar, Rac'nRay's Throttle Mod, Homemade Oversize Lowers, Kawasaki Trunk, Ivan's Flash

Past:
2014 900 Classic LT: (Sold to a happy buyer)
1975 Suzuki GT 185 (Great little twin)
VulcanDan61 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bike weight vs overall weight jeff72 Vulcan 1700 1 06-24-2012 10:38 PM
what weight oil for 2009 vulcan 900 vulkurt Vulcan 900 13 06-21-2010 06:40 AM
Max riding weight on 900LT? guitpic Vulcan 900 17 10-24-2009 09:20 PM
Max riding weight on 1700LT? guitpic Vulcan 1700 7 08-29-2009 12:36 PM
2 questions...mileage and max weight Mcasper Vulcan 1500 4 06-26-2009 02:42 PM

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome