Tire Wear - Kawasaki Vulcan Forum : Vulcan Forums
» Insurance
» Sponsors
Go Back   Kawasaki Vulcan Forum : Vulcan Forums > Motorcycle Models > Vulcan 500

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-14-2012, 10:23 AM   #1
old
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SW MO
Posts: 397
Garage
Default Tire Wear

Is is normal for the rear tire on a cruiser to wear out much faster than the front?

My tires:
1) front - Bridgestone Excedra G701, mfg 06/24/08
2) rear - Bridgestone Excedra G702, mfg 04/27/08

The rear is worn almost to the tread wear indicator, the front is not. That being said, I plan to replace both of them around the first of 2013.

Bike has almost 6K miles, had 1800 when I bought it.

Just wondering if I should buy a different brand of tire(s) to get more even wear between front & rear. I keep air pressure at recommended level, and ride "sanely".
__________________
'09 Kawasaki Vulcan 500 LTD
old is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-14-2012, 11:06 AM   #2
Brichm03
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 97
Default

My front went 4000 miles further than the stock rear. I didn't even get to do any smokey tire burnouts.
__________________
2006 Kawasaki Vulcan Classic LT

Cobra Pipes
Cobra Fi2000r
Cobra Billet Tachometer
Mustang Seat with Mustang Passenger Backrest
Arlen Ness Big Sucker Intake
Engine Guard
Kuryakrn Grips
Wolo Bad Boy Horn
Passenger Floorboards
Brichm03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 12:38 PM   #3
Comanche
Senior Member
 
Comanche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 346
Garage
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by old View Post
Is is normal for the rear tire on a cruiser to wear out much faster than the front?

My tires:
1) front - Bridgestone Excedra G701, mfg 06/24/08
2) rear - Bridgestone Excedra G702, mfg 04/27/08

The rear is worn almost to the tread wear indicator, the front is not. That being said, I plan to replace both of them around the first of 2013.

Bike has almost 6K miles, had 1800 when I bought it.

Just wondering if I should buy a different brand of tire(s) to get more even wear between front & rear. I keep air pressure at recommended level, and ride "sanely".
Tire mileage, as you know, is dependent upon variables such as pressure, temperature, road conditions, driving/riding habits, mechanical condition etc. etc. etc. and the manufacturing processes used to make the tire. One type of tire is better quality than the other but it does seem normal considering the weight distribution of the bike. The only thing that wouldn't be normal is if there are wear indicators showing problems with the swingarm or other suspension components and those are noticeably different than regular tread wear. Give her a good thorough inspection to ensure all is within specs and that will give you your answer.
__________________
It ain't about where you live; it's about how you live. So, ride to live, Bruh.
Comanche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 01:11 PM   #4
bikerbill
Top Contributor
 
bikerbill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Levelland, TX
Posts: 1,370
Default

That mileage sounds about right from my riding experience. I get about 14k on a front and 5-8k on a Bridgestone rear. A Dunlop 491 Elite II would last 15-18k but at twice the cost. Currently I run a car tire on the rear. They have been lasting about 15k miles with little handling issues.
__________________
--
'Biker' Bill
'97 EN500LTD 'Hidalgo'
168,000+ miles so far
VROC #3833
IronButt #6024
Levelland, TX

SlipStreamer Enterprise II, Vista Cruise,
Fiamm air horns, Cobra Spots, Drifter solo seat,
Pro-Tac backrest, 17/42 sprockets, Darkside rear,
ScottOiler, F&S luggage rack ,Throttle Rocker,
Viking bags, Victory Vegas handlebars,
Kuryakyn grips, LED & HID lighting,
4-gal AUX fuel tank

http://bikerbillsvulcan500rebuild.shutterfly.com/

Last edited by bikerbill; 11-14-2012 at 06:43 PM.
bikerbill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 06:32 PM   #5
rick
Top Contributor
 
rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: dalton ga.
Posts: 2,688
Garage
Default

On my 800 classic, my rear wears about twice as fast as the front. Running Dunlop 402s, I get around 18,000 on the rear, and around 35-38,000 on the front. I try to keep the air at 40 psi. most always 2up. Bike is rear weight biased, putting more weight on the rear tire, this being one of the reasons the rear wears so much faster.
rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 07:17 PM   #6
Bokobob
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Gastonia, NC, west of Charlotte.
Posts: 65
Default

I swear by the michelin Commander II tires...Have nearly 4000 miles on a rear
tire on my Honda magna cruiser and it has no visible wear at all.....Just installed two on my Vulcan 500....They cost very little more than other tires...
The rear on my 500 is 10 MM wider than stock but that seems to be no issue.
Only saying.

Bob
Bokobob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 10:24 PM   #7
Romans5.8
Super Moderator
 
Romans5.8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,976
Garage
Default

My rear wears faster as well. About 5,000 miles ago I replaced my rear, and I'd say I've got another 1,000 to go on the current front. Both tires were replaced at the same time last time.

Bike has 20,000 miles on it, it's on rear number 3, front number 2. It's about to have front number 3, but then shortly after it'll be on rear number 4.

Others report the front wearing faster, I suspect that might be due to not accelerating hard, and using the clutch more often when stopping and using the front brake almost exclusively. None of these are bad or anything, but, they are going to accelerate wear to the front and reduce wear on the rear. Those of us that like to open it up every now and then, engine brake, and frequently use the rear brake in conjunction with the front, are going to go through rear tires quicker and save some wear on the front!

That's the thing about motorcycles, every single one is different and every rider is different! Average MPG down in the 900 section seems to range from 35 mpg to 60 mpg. I get 45~55mpg two up with a tour pak, windshield and hard bags, while others struggle to get above 40mpg solo. Everyone rides differently and how you ride is going to affect your bike differently than how I ride!
__________________
"8 But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us."

Romans 5:8 (NIV)

2006 Vulcan 900 Classic LT "Couch-a-Saki/Mini-Bagger"

2011 Honda Shadow Aero 750 (Wife's)
Romans5.8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 01:50 AM   #8
PI Robert
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Port Isabel, TX
Posts: 135
Default

I think the rear tire normally wears faster than the front because of unequal weight distribution, as indicated by the Kawa recommended tire pressures of 28 psi for the front and 32 psi for the rear, and, especially, acceleration and deceleration generated friction coming exclusively on the rear tire. I can't imagine what normal riding circumstances would make the front wear faster than the rear.
__________________
2000 Kawasaki Vulcan EN-500C, 15k
PI Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 10:28 PM   #9
coolmesser
Senior Member
 
coolmesser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 433
Default

I looked today and my rear is wearing faster too. Maybe it's my age.
__________________
All custom Vulcan 500 Long Chopper
with 10" over tubes and King & Queen seat
coolmesser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 05:54 AM   #10
Bokobob
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Gastonia, NC, west of Charlotte.
Posts: 65
Default

Thinking about rear vs front tire wear, we all know this but may not fully appreciate the immense part friction plays in the comparision...The front tire is always coasting...the rear tire rarely coasts, even when decelerating, as the engine braking is occurring then...This seems to me to be a major cause of rear tire wearing faster, along with the extra weight on it as already pointed out....A biking buddy told me that the speed of twisting my right hand when accelerating also has a major effect..

Once again, I cannot praiser the Michelin Commander II tire enough for very long wear..

Bob
Bokobob is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
Motorcycle News, Videos and Reviews
Honda Grom Forum Harley Davidson Forum Honda 600RR Kawasaki Forum Yamaha R6 Forum Yamaha FZ-09 Forum
1199 Panigale Forum Roadglide Forum Honda CBR1000 Forum Vulcan Forum Yamaha R1 Forum Yamaha R3 Forum
Ducati Monster Forum Harley Forums Honda CBR250R Forum ZX10R Forum Star Raider Forum Yamaha Viking Forum
Suzuki GSXR Forum V-Rod Forums Honda Shadow Forum Kawasaki Motorcycle Forum Star Warrior Forum KTM Duke 390 Forum
SV650 Forum BMW S1000RR Forum Honda Fury Forum Kawasaki Versys Forum Drag Racing Forum Ducati 899 Panigale Forum
Suzuki V-Strom BMW K1600 Triumph Forum Victory Forums Sportbikes BMW NineT Forum
Volusia Forum BMW F800 Forum Triumph 675 Forum MV Agusta Forum HD Street Forum Suzuki GW250 Forum
Yamaha Motorcycles Victory Gunner Forum Honda Vultus Forum HD LiveWire Forum Ninja H2 Forum Ducati Scrambler Forum